Legal Opinion
Shirk v. Thomas
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1889No. 13,814PublishedCited by 31 opinions
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
— The facts pleaded by the appellants as their cause of action, shortly stated, are these: The ancestor of the appellants acquired title to the land in controversy by warranty deed from James H. Tyner, executed on the 6th day of December, 1884, and recorded on the 18th day of February, 1885, and James H. Tyner acquired title from Albert H. Tyner, then the owner of the land, by a warranty deed, executed on the 1st day of August, 1884, but not recorded until May of the following year.. On the 28th day of October, 1884, William S. Thomas caused a writ of attachment to issue against Albert H.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Watson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hays v. RegerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Fitzpatrick v. PapaIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Currier v. ElliotIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.