Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. City of Lansing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Ingham; Person, J. Case by George S. Ostrander against the city of Lansing-for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment of $2,500 for injuries received while in the employ of *694defendant in constructing a sewer in the year 1892. The injury occurred from the caving in of the earth on one side of the excavation, and there seems to be no dispute that this might have been avoided by properly shoring up the sides, which it was customary to do. But on this occasion there was not sufficient lumber there for the purpose, and but a single board was placed on either side of the excavation, about one foot below the surface, with a prop between. When the plaintiff had reached a depth of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Barron v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Parkhurst v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Breen v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Foss v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hodgins v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API