Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1883PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (O. H. Gage, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The plaintiff, as administrator of her deceased husband Daniel Parkhurst, brings suit against Johnson for causing the death of.her husband by negligence. She recovered judgment in the circuit court, and the principal question on this record is, whether there was any evidence of negligence on the part of defendant to go to the jury.

The principal facts in the case are these: Johnson, in the fall of 1880, was proprietor of a lime kiln in East Saginaw, which he was then operating. It was customary, when the stone at the base of the kiln was sufficiently burned, to take it out. When this was. done…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API