Legal Opinion
Bloody Point Property Owners Ass'n v. Ashton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 20, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000222; No. 5262PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.
William A. Ashton, Jr. and Michele C. Ashton appeal the master-in-equity’s denial of their motion to vacate/set aside a foreclosure sale, arguing the master erred in finding (1) they were properly served; (2) their due process rights were not violated; (3) the foreclosure sales price did not shock the conscience of the court; and (4) David L. Fingerhut and Patricia M. Santry were bona fide purchasers for value pursuant to section 15-39-870 of the South Carolina Code. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This action arises from the foreclosure sale of Lot 55, Daufuskie Island Club, Phase 1,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Carson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Std. Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Gladden v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Cumbie v. NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Belle Hall Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Wachesaw Plantation East Community Services Ass'n v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Buffalo Creek investments, Inc. v. Stephen H. PettusCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.