Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Hale
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentLockemy, C.J.
I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the mortgage should be taken into account when determining whether a bid at a judicial sale is so grossly inadequate it shocks the conscience. I would utilize the Equity Method as a better vehicle to determine whether a bid shocks the conscience.
As the majority concedes, this court has previously approved the use of the Equity Method to determine the adequacy of a successful bid during a judicial sale. See Fed. Nat. Morg. Ass'n v. Brooks , 304 S.C. 506, 510, 405 S.E.2d 604, 606 (Ct. App. 1991). While the majority correctly indicates the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. SandersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Bloody Point Property Owners Ass'n v. AshtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Arrow Bonding Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Stoney v. StoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017