Legal Opinion

Carson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 7, 2012No. 27186PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

In this wrongful death and survival action involving a train collision, Connie Carson (Appellant), as personal representative of the estate of Beryl Harvey, argues the circuit court erroneously excluded certain evidence, charged the jury, and permitted an inconsistent verdict in the survival action. We affirm the circuit court’s evidentiary determinations and jury charge, but reverse the circuit court’s decision denying Appellant’s request for a new trial nisi additur and remand the survival action for a new trial absolute.

Facts/Procedural Background

On May 30, 2004, at approximately 7:05…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. GuillenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Herzog v. Lexington TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Berberich v. JackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hayes v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of GonzalezSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Bloody Point Property Owners Ass'n v. AshtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Fisher Ex Rel. Estate of Shaw-Baker v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  5. In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API