Legal Opinion

Hartzog v. Andalusia Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1930No. 4 Div. 498PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The bill shows that complainant was an existing creditor of D. M. Hartzog at the time he executed a deed to the land therein described to his wife, and the primary purpose of the bill is to have said conveyance set aside as fraudulent and void as to this complainant. In one alternative, it is alleged that the said conveyance was without consideration, and in the other-that, if there was in fact any consideration, it was grossly inade quate, with averment of the value of the property and the recited consideration.

The assignments of demurrer take only two points as. to the foregoing averments.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seals v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Beall & Coston v. Lehman Durr Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Boutwell v. Spurlin Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Tyson v. South. C. O. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Schwab v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. McGowin v. McGowinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Drain v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Harris v. First Nat. Bank of TuscumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API