Legal Opinion

Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1936No. 6 Div. 824PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a bill filed in equity, and was amended, and to it as finally amended demurrers were overruled, and an appeal now taken by respondents. It is sought to foreclose a mortgage, to have a deficiency decree entered, if there is such deficiency, and that certain transfers of property be set aside as fraudulent and be subject to the deficiency indebtedness.

The mortgage was made to the city of Birmingham as sole trustee under the last will and testament of Sallie E. Jackson, deceased. The habendum clause extends to its successors also.

By amendment to the bill, it is alleged…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Braley v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Blakeney v. DuboseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. First Ala. Bank of Montgomery, NA v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Mudd v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Amann v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API