Legal Opinion

Harris v. First Nat. Bank of Tuscumbia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1933No. 8 Div. 501PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill is by simple contract creditors (section 7342, Code 1923) to avoid as fraudulent certain conveyances of real estate by their debtors.

True, by amendment to the bill, it appears that since its filing complainants have recovered at law judgments against both the maker and indorser on the notes, but this was merely for the purpose of foreclosing any defensive matters (Yeend v. Weeks, 104 Ala. 331, 16 So. 165, 53 Am. St. Rep. 50; Wooten v. Steele, 109 Ala. 563, 19 So. 972, 55 Am. St. Rep. 947), and in no manner changed the original character of the suit. No final decree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yeend v. WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Dixie Coal Min. & Mfg. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Galloway v. ShaddixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Wooten v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Franklin v. NunnelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. East End Memorial Ass'n v. EgermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Appelbaum v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. CHESTER B. BROWN COMPANY v. GoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API