Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

General Mut. Ins. Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided December 29, 1953No. Civ. 4698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff is a creditor of one William Holst, doing business as Jack Holst Contracting Company, who was apparently engaged in the building and construction business during the period from March 24, 1952 to September 5, 1952.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff issued its policy of compensation insurance to Holst, which insured his employees during this period in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of New York, McK.Consol. Laws, e. 67. During the period above referred to the agreed price and reasonable value of the premium earned upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States v. CoxDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1953
  5. Bryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Stern & Co. v. State Loan and Finance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  3. Allison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Chambers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API