Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 26, 1982No. 39-81TPublished

1DissentSkelton, Senior Judge

I respectfully dissent.

I. The Jursidictional Question

At the outset we have a very serious jurisdictional question by reason of the provisions of Title 28, § 1502, which provides as follows:

§ 1502. Treaty cases

Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, the Court of Claims shall not have jurisdiction of any claim against the United States growing out of or dependent upon any treaty entered into with foreign nations.

The Supreme Court and our court have held that the statute deprives us of jurisdiction if the right itself, which the petition makes to be the foundation of the claim, has its…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API