Legal Opinion
State v. Hoisington
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 1983No. 14514PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Justice.
On this appeal we are asked to review the propriety of imposing a twenty-year indeterminate sentence in place of a fixed sentence of eight years after it was determined that the “fixed” nature of the eight-year sentence was not legal. We uphold the imposition of the twenty-year sentence.
Monte Hoisington was found guilty, by a jury, of rape. A judgment of conviction was entered and he was sentenced to a fixed term of eight years. The conviction was upheld on appeal. See State v. Hoisington, 104 Idaho 153, 657 P.2d 17 (1983). While that appeal was pending, Hoisington…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. LindquistIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HoisingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MoneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. MendenhallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Staley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MalandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MartinesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.