State v. Mendenhall
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
In these consolidated cases, we are asked to decide whether concurrent sentences for grand larceny and escape can be converted into consecutive sentences after the defendant has violated probation. For reasons explained below, we hold that they cannot. The sentences are vacated, and each case is remanded for resentencing.
William C. Mendenhall was convicted by a jury of grand larceny. While confined in the Clearwater Countyjail to await sentencing, he escaped. Several years later, he was arrested. He pled guilty to escape under I.C. § 18-2505. A presentence investigation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Offield v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- State v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. PedrazaIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ramirez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. BrandtIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. MoneyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. McKaughenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fullmer v. CollardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.