United States v. Reinecke
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEONARD, Senior Judge:
The military judge dismissed the charge and specification in this case after finding Sergeant Lamer had been denied a speedy trial. R.C.M. 707(e). The government has appealed that ruling. Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862. We find the military judge’s ruling to be in error.
In determining whether Sergeant Lamer was denied a speedy trial, the period of contention is a 95 day period from 7 December 1989 through 11 March 1990. The military judge found this period to be attributable to the government. The government maintains that it should have been counted as a defense…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. TrueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. ReineckeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. LamerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990