Legal Opinion

United States v. Reinecke

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 27, 1990No. COMR No. 90A-05PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

The military judge dismissed the charge and specification in this case after finding Sergeant Lamer had been denied a speedy trial. R.C.M. 707(e). The government has appealed that ruling. Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862. We find the military judge’s ruling to be in error.

In determining whether Sergeant Lamer was denied a speedy trial, the period of contention is a 95 day period from 7 December 1989 through 11 March 1990. The military judge found this period to be attributable to the government. The government maintains that it should have been counted as a defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. TrueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. ReineckeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. LamerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API