Legal Opinion
United States v. Reinecke
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided May 14, 1990No. Misc. Dkt. No. 90A-03PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
LEONARD, Senior Judge:
The government has appealed the military judge’s rulings that the seizure of a urine specimen from Airman First Class Strozier was without probable cause and not covered by the good faith exception, that the handling of the urine specimen substantially violated Air Force regulations, and that the evidence derived from the urine specimen must be suppressed. We find that the military judge erred and overrule his suppression of Strozier’s cocaine positive urinalysis.
Strozier was apprehended at Fort Lewis, Washington, on 25 September 1989, at 2129, for drunk and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. PostleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. FlesherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. StrozierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. BentonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. PachecoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- Evans v. KilroyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.