Gimbel v. Waldman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdeb, J.
Motion to dismiss the two canses of action set out in the complaint upon the ground that each fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The suit is against a lawyer; the first cause of action is to recover damages for negligently and incompetently advising the plaintiff concerning various questions of law as a result of which she, as the purported wife of the decedent named, accepted a settlement from the executors of the estate of the deceased in the sum of $25,000, in full settlement of all her claims, whereas, it is alleged, hut for such negligent and incompetent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goodman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Bank of China, Japan & the Straits, Ltd. v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Citizens Loan Fund & Savings Ass'n v. FriedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hanna v. . LichtenheinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re the Estate of BrushNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Logalbo v. PlishkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Floro v. LawtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.