Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Brush

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The verity of the ancient adage respecting the untoward results of canine malignment was never better illustrated than in the law relating to the subject of testamentary stipulations which conditions benefits upon an abstention by the legatee from contest of the will of the donor. A large proportion- of the judicial utterances adjudicating the effect of such conditions refer to them as “ in terrorem ” provisos, but such an appellation adds nothing illuminating to a consideration of the subject, and, as the Court of Appeals has aptly observed, is “ merely, a convenient phrase…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Oliver v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Robinson v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wells v. MennSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  2. In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. Gimbel v. WaldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In re the Estate of ZaiacNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API