Donroy, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
SWEIGERT, District Judge.
These cases, consolidated upon defendant’s motion, are suits for the recovery of federal income tax. Plaintiffs, Canadian corporations, allege that, during the taxable years, 1955 and 1956, they were limited partners in California limited partnerships, that they did not have a permanent establishment in the United States, that, therefore, the rate of tax applicable to them was 15% under Article XI of the Tax Convention with Canada, and that all tax paid in excess of that rate was overpaid and should be refunded.
Defendant filed answers denying these allegations and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reed v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- De Amodio v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Crain v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Johnston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Toor v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Bedolla v. Logan & FrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Melvin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Donroy, Ltd., Dostrey, Ltd., Lacancal, Ltd., and Transpat, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Fisher v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.