Toor v. Westover
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause, heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:
Judgment will be for the defendant that the plaintiff take nothing by his complaint; findings and judgment to be prepared by counsel for the defendant under Local Rule 7.
Comment.
While the hearing in this case resulted in a voluminous record, and extensive briefs have been filed by both sides, the problem is rather simple. It is this: Did the trust agreement entered into by the plaintiff as manager o'f the marital community property with the Beverly Hills National Bank and Trust…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Greenberger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Toor v. Westover. Toor v. WestoverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Donroy, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
- Schlobohm v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Smith v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- West v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.