Legal Opinion

Toor v. Westover

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 21, 1950No. Civ. No. 10461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

The above-entitled cause, heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:

Judgment will be for the defendant that the plaintiff take nothing by his complaint; findings and judgment to be prepared by counsel for the defendant under Local Rule 7.

Comment.

While the hearing in this case resulted in a voluminous record, and extensive briefs have been filed by both sides, the problem is rather simple. It is this: Did the trust agreement entered into by the plaintiff as manager o'f the marital community property with the Beverly Hills National Bank and Trust…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Greenberger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Toor v. Westover. Toor v. WestoverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Donroy, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
  3. Schlobohm v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  4. Smith v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  5. West v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API