Legal Opinion

Patel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1990No. 1257-86PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

WHITE, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for murder. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 19.02(a)(1). After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at fifteen years imprisonment.

On direct appeal the Sixth Court of Appeals, in a published per curiam opinion, affirmed the conviction. Patel v. State, 720 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.App.—6 Dist, 1986). On evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence on the appellant’s affirmative defense of insanity, the Court of Appeals utilized two standards of review: (1) the Van Guilder standard, Van…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Van Guilder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Schuessler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Meraz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Love v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  2. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Moody v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Borkowicz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API