Legal Opinion

Moody v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 30, 1992No. 01-89-00378-CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

A jury found brothers Carl Eugene Moody and Kenneth Charles Moody guilty of resisting arrest. The trial court sentenced Carl to 20 days in jail and a $150 fine, and sentenced Kenneth to 90 days in jail and a $200 fine. Another brother, Davis Moody, was also charged, but the trial court instructed an acquittal as to him. We reverse and remand the judgment for retrial.

1. Sufficiency of the evidence

In point of error three, appellants complain the evidence is insufficient to support their convictions where the officers used excessive force.

The proper standard of review…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Leos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  2. Escovedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Bynum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API