Legal Opinion
Warfield v. Fischer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 27, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 N.J. Super. 142 (1967)
227 A.2d 148
ROBERTA LOUISE WARFIELD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALFRED A. FISCHER, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 27, 1967.
Mr. Clifford W. Starrett, attorney for plaintiff (Messrs. Schenck, Price, Smith and King, attorneys).
Mrs. Sonia Napolitano, attorney for defendant (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell and Foley, attorneys).
FULOP, J.S.C.
Defendant moves to quash the service of the summons in this case and also to dismiss the complaint.
The motion to set aside the service of the summons is based upon the position that service was not made at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kurilla Ex Rel. Kurilla v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- In Re the Estate of GardinierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Missell v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Mygatt v. CoeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Eckman v. GrearPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Romjue v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. AbagnaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- A & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. WetzlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970