Legal Opinion
Eckman v. Grear
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
Decided October 17, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ueutze, C. P. J.
The proceeding before the court is on a rule to show cause why the service of the summons and complaint on the defendant Clarence Grear, who is a son of the other defendant herein, Clarence M. Grear, should not be set aside and dismissed. This motion is in behalf of the son and he is hereinafter called the defendant, and/or Clarence M. Grear, Jr.
On the 29th day of December, 1934, the defendant Clarence M. Grear, Jr., was driving an automobile in Camden county, which figured in an accident, and as a result thereof, the plaintiff Allen Eckman, Jr., was injured. At this time, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Shaeffer v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Berryhill v. SeppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Missell v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shurman v. Atlantic Mortg. & Inv. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Merritt v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.