Legal Opinion

Thoenes v. Tatro

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1974PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action to recover damages for bodily injuries. A default judgment was entered January 31, 1973. In March, 1973, defendant moved to quash the return of service and vacate the judgment. After denial of this motion, he moved the court to reconsider and for leave to supplement the record. Defendant appeals from the orders denying each of these motions.

The complaint in the underlying action (a personal injury action charging defendant with negligent operation of his automobile on December 10,1970) was filed on November 20, 1972. A copy of the complaint and summons were delivered to the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Belknap v. CharltonOregon Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Romjue v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Zirbes v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API