3535 Salem Corp. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In reversing the Tax Commissioner’s conclusions and finding that the transactions involved' here are nontaxable, the Board of Tax Appeals relied upon the “true object” test originally enunciated by this court in Acountant's Computer Services v. Kosydar (1973), 35 Ohio St. 2d 120, and as reaffirmed in Miami Citizens National Bank v. Lindley (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 249.
The board found that the taxpayer “* * * sought as the true object of the transactions with the aerial survey firms the survey information contained on the map. The surveyors were professional engineers and surveyors who not only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Accountant's Computer Services, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Miami Citizens National Bank & Trust Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Financial Computer Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Fliteways, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Thomas v. Hart Realty, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.