Legal Opinion

State v. Lane

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2009No. 20070878, 20061126PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

$1 Appellants, Peggy Hay and Patricia Hay (collectively, the Victims), appeal the district court's grant of Defendant/Appellee Brandon R. Lane's Motion to Dismiss his plea in abeyance. 1 Neither the State nor Lane appealed the dismissal; thus we must determine whether the Victims may independently appeal the dismissal of Lane's plea in abeyance. We hold that they cannot because no party to the case appealed the lower court's dismissal of the case and the dismissal deprives the Victims of standing. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

1 2…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burkett v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ellis v. SwensenUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. Sun Surety Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. DavieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Duchesne Land, LC v. Division of Consumer ProtectionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API