Legal Opinion
Oneac Corp. v. Raychem Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 29, 1998No. 97 C 2541PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
On April 14, 1997, plaintiff Oneac Corporation brought a patent infringement action against defendant Raychem Corporation alleging that the defendant is infringing U.S. Patent No. 4,758,920 (the “920 patent”). The ’920 patent, entitled “Telephone and Data Overvoltage Protection Apparatus,” originally issued to Thomas McCartney on July 19, 1988, and was later assigned to plaintiff. The ’920 patent relates generally to an overvoltage protection circuit for a pair of telephone lines and similar data communication channel. More particularly,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Bell Communications Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Amica Life Insurance v. BarborDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Jackson v. Casio PhoneMate, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- HP Tuners, LLC v. CannataDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022