Legal Opinion
Bamonte v. City of Mesa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2010No. 08-16206PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GOULD.
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, police officers employed by Appellee City of Mesa (City), challenge the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the City. The officers contended that the City violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to compensate police officers for the donning and doffing of their uniforms and, accompanying gear. Because officers had the option of donning and doffing their uniforms and gear at home, the district court determined that these activities were not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Rearden LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Perez v. Mountaire Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.