Legal Opinion
Harold Hall v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2012No. 10-55770PublishedCited by 524 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
OPINION
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Harold C. Hall appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the City of Los Angeles and individual defendants Mark Arneson and Kenneth Crocker (collectively, “Appellees”) in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment to Appellees on Hall’s fabrication-of-evidence claim, and we affirm on that basis. We reverse, how ever, the district court’s denial of Hall’s motion to amend his complaint and remand to the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by524 opinions
- John Crowley v. Bruce BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Donald Stacy v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Roberto Silva-Pereira v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Mary Tatum v. Steven MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
519 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.