Legal Opinion
Tana Oil and Gas Corp. v. Cernosek
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 10, 2006No. 03-04-00820-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
We grant the motion for rehearing solely on the issue of attorney’s fees and withdraw our opinion and judgment of December 14, 2005. We substitute this opinion, delete the remand to the district court, and render judgment that Tana is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees. The motion for rehearing is overruled in all other respects.
Tana Oil and Gas Corp. (Tana) appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment holding that Tana breached the terms of its oil and gas lease agreements with appellees, a class of mineral-interest owners (the “Class”),…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Chambers v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Wells v. Chattanooga Bakery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- Commissioner of the General Land Office v. Sandridge Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Occidental Permian Ltd. v. Helen Jones Foundation, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Millican DPC Partners, LP and Peach Creek Partners Ltd v. Frank Bobbitt McGregor Trust, Doris McGregor, Trustee, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.