Legal Opinion

Castor v. Erlandson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1977No. 83650, 83651, SC 24250, 24251PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The jury awarded plaintiffs $8,500 general damages and $30,000 punitive damages in these consolidated fraud actions. The defendant appeals.

The defendant has made seven assignments of error, none of which comply with the Rules of Procedure of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Rule 6.18 states:

"* * * The assignment of error must be specific and must set out verbatim the pertinent portions of the record. Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching the record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered * * (Emphasis added.)

This has been the rule for many…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Karsun v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Beecher v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Elvalsons v. Industrial Covers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Friesen v. FuitenOregon Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roshak v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Salahub v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API