Legal Opinion

Troutman v. Erlandson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1977No. TC 93993, SC 24785PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This was an action for contribution. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that plaintiffs had paid a $44,000 obligation owed jointly by plaintiffs and defendant and that defendant was obligated to "make contribution of one-third of said debt * * * or the sum of $16,500.”

Defendant’s answer included, in addition to a general denial and three affirmative defenses, a counterclaim for $50,000 in damages alleging, among other things, that plaintiffs "know full well that this defendant was not to be responsible for any part” of the $44,000 obligation and were "attempting to use this litigation as a form of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Walker v. PennerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. BatehamOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Criqui v. Pearl Music Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Jett v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Rhodes v. HarwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Davis v. Pacific Diesel Power Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API