Troutman v. Erlandson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This was an action for contribution. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that plaintiffs had paid a $44,000 obligation owed jointly by plaintiffs and defendant and that defendant was obligated to "make contribution of one-third of said debt * * * or the sum of $16,500.”
Defendant’s answer included, in addition to a general denial and three affirmative defenses, a counterclaim for $50,000 in damages alleging, among other things, that plaintiffs "know full well that this defendant was not to be responsible for any part” of the $44,000 obligation and were "attempting to use this litigation as a form of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Walker v. PennerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. BatehamOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Criqui v. Pearl Music Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Jett v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Rhodes v. HarwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Davis v. Pacific Diesel Power Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.