Legal Opinion
State v. Hyde
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 21, 1977No. 31125, CA 6684PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for perjury, asserting several rulings to have been erroneous.
First, he complains of the failure of the trial court to sustain his demurrer. The indictment charged as follows:
"The said DAVID HYDE on or about the 11th day of February, 1976, in the County of Benton and State of Oregon, having been called as a witness before the Benton County District Court in the matter of the preliminary hearing in cases of State of Oregon v. Norman Francis Demers and State of Oregon v. Thomas S. Hanna did unlawfully and knowingly make a false sworn statement, to-wit: that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Roshak v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Castor v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State of Oregon v. MonkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. GuyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- People v. PostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- State v. CastrejonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.