Legal Opinion
Boyce v. San Diego High School District
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13189PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries, brought by plaintiff and respondent against defendant San Diego High School District and the members of its board of education. Plaintiff was a member of a partnership in the business of installing electrical appli anees. Harry Bertolucci was the electrical superintendent for defendant district. The Russ auditorium was erected by the district in 1925 for school activities. Some three years after its construction, the heating and ventilating system got out of order, and on October 22, 1928, Bertolucci requested plaintiff to look over the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dawson v. Tulare Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Bush v. Weed Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Madigan v. O. A. Hale & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Palmer v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bosqui v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Woodman v. Hemet Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.