Madigan v. O. A. Hale & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury. The action was to recover damages on account of personal injury alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant. A statement of the case follows.
The plaintiff at the date of the injury was a salesman engaged in the delivery of nine cases of groceries to the defendant company. The latter operates a large store in the city of San Jose. The goods sold are not manufactured on the premises, but the business conducted is that of retailing merchandise…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Brinkworth v. Sam Seelig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Corbett v. SpanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Smith v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Buckingham v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Jones v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Thompson v. B. F. Goodrich Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.