Legal Opinion

Bosqui v. City of San Bernardino

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1935No. L. A. 14946PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District. Upon further consideration we adopt the opinion of Mr. Justice Marks as part of the opinion of this court. It reads as follows:

“The plaintiffs are the adult children of Daniel Van Allen Bosqui and Mary Bosqui, his wife, who were killed in an automobile accident at about noon on the 17th day of April, 1932. For the sake of brevity we will refer to the City of San Bernardino as the City, and to The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company as the Company.
“The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API