Legal Opinion
DiStefano v. Milardo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 2005No. SC 17221PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the trial court properly instructed the jury that no attorney-client relationship existed between the named defendant, Joseph E. Milardo, Jr., a partner in the law firm of Jozus, Milardo and Thomasson (law firm), 1 and the plaintiffs son, Lawrence J. DiStefano, when it instructed the jury on the allegation of breach of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff, Olga J. DiStefano, appeals, following our grant of certification from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Jacobs v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Janusauskas v. FichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Winn v. PosadesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.