Legal Opinion
Ekotek Site PRP Committee v. Self
District Court, D. Utah
Decided March 18, 1998No. 94-277LPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff The Ekotek Site PRP Committee (the Committee) brought this contribution action against a number of defendants pursuant to the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675, to recover a portion of its past and future costs incurred in cleaning up a site contaminated by hazardous substances. After a number of settlements and dismissals, only plaintiffs claim against defendant Morrison Knudsen Corporation (MK) remained for trial. Phase I of plaintiffs litigation against MK…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKesson Corporation v. Gary W. Flanders Great Northern Transportation Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
- Clark v. RichmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- State v. BraeschNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Berry v. School Dist. of City of Benton HarborDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.