Legal Opinion
Clark v. Richman
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 2004No. 4:00-CV-1306PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MCCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND:
This action is brought on behalf of a class of disabled individuals who receive Medical Assistance (MA) benefits. Plaintiffs, by and through their next friends, allege that they have been denied access to dental services due to the policies of defendant, the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare (DPW), and seek enforcement of certain provisions of Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1S96-1396V (Title XIX, or the Medicaid Act).
Specifically, plaintiffs allege that DPW violated 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(A) by not…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Westside Mothers v. OlszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Westside Mothers v. OlszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Katie A. Ex Rel. Ludin v. Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. EisemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Lewis Ex Rel. Young v. RendellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.