Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1964No. 536PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that in addition

to the fraudulent acts and conduct of the defendant in procuring the execution of the deed in question, she breached the fiduciary relationship that existed between the plaintiff and the defendant at the time. On the other hand, the defendant contends the transaction was a purely personal one, wholly unrelated to the administration of the estate of Almon F. Smith, father of the plaintiff.

In the case of Cole v. Stokes, 113 N.C. 270, 18 S.E. 321, Shepherd, C.J., said: “It is well settled that an executor or administrator in dealing with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Lockridge v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Cole v. . StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Hayes v. . PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Carland v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Collier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Ingle v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Thompson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Campbell v. First Baptist Church of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API