Legal Opinion

Carland v. . Allison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Tbe defendant excepts for tbat tbe court permitted tbe plaintiffs to offer in evidence, for attack, tbe deed executed by Kerlee to him. This exception is without merit. Tbe plaintiffs could not engage in shadow boxing. Tbe validity of tbe deed was at issue and it was necessary for them to offer it for attack to have something at which to strike. This is tbe accepted practice. Burton v. Peace, 206 N. C., 99, 173 S. E., 4.

There was ample and persuasive evidence of tbe mental incompetency of tbe grantor. This alone would defeat defendant’s general motion to dismiss as of nonsuit. A careful…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Eyre v. PotterSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. In Re Will of CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whitley v. ReddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Chesson v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. In Re Will of LomaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API