Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1955No. Crim. No. 5591; S. F. No. 19158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

By a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on October 17, 1951, Caryl Chessman, an inmate of San Quentin State Prison whose appeal from 17 judgments of conviction was pending, sought relief from allegedly illegal conditions of imprisonment which assertedly interfered with his representation of himself.1 On December 18, 1951, this court affirmed the judgments, two of which imposed the death penalty. (People v. Chessman, 38 Cal.2d 166 [238 P.2d 1001].) The subject matter of Chessman’s petition for habeas corpus has no relevancy whatsoever to the proceedings at the trial which resulted in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API