Ramirez v. Murray
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, Yuba Góúnty. The facts material to the points decided are fully set forth in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
This was originally an action of assumpsit to recover rent for the occupation of premises in the city of Marysville. The complaint is in the usual form of a declaration in indebitatus assumpsit.
On the trial, the plaintiff introduced the record Court of Yuba County, showing a recovery in ejectment against defendant, and after proving the monthly value of the J the case. The defendant moved for a nonsuit, and the Court directed the jury to find a special verdict reserving the question”
From the plaintiff's own showing it is apparent that he was not entitled to recover…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Conner v. CorbittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Warnock v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Givens v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Stubbs v. AbercrombieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Wheeler v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.