Legal Opinion
Birdwell v. Skeen
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 3, 1991No. Civ. A. No. TY-90-186-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUSTICE, District Judge.
Before the court for resolution is an application for the writ of habeas corpus filed by David Andrew Birdwell, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, Birdwell attacks the validity of his Texas convictions for aggravated bank robbery and aggravated kidnapping.
Statement of Facts
In 1985, the applicant, Birdwell, pled guilty to federal bank robbery charges; and in 1986, he was convicted in Smith County, Texas, of aggravated kidnapping and aggravated bank robbery. All three of these convictions stem from the June 25, 1985, armed robbery of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Bernard Stroble v. Charles Anderson, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Urban J. Didier, A/K/A "Harp,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- State v. HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- BROWN v. ARMSTRONGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Birdwell v. SkeenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993