Legal Opinion
Tri-State Produce Co. v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided April 30, 1952No. Civ. 637PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVEN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a shipper, commenced this action in the District Court of Iowa in and for Woodbury County against the defendant, an initial carrier, for damages claimed to have been sustained by it because of the claimed failure of the delivering carrier to give the plaintiff timely notice of the non-delivery of a car of frozen turkeys. In the alternative it claimed damages for the conversion of the car by the delivering carrier. The amount of damages claimed under either theory of recovery was $3,052.02. The action was brought against the defendant as the initial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Watson Bros. Transp. Co., Inc. v. Feinberg Kosher Sausage CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Stoddard Lumber Co. v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Estherville Produce Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Garcia v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cordeco Development Corporation v. Antonio Santiago Vasquez, Cordeco Development Corporation v. Antonio Santiago Vasquez, Inez Acevedo CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Polaroid Corporation v. Schuster's Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Tractortechnic Gebrueder Kulenkempft & Co. v. BousmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
- John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987