Legal Opinion
Estherville Produce Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1932No. 9276, 9264PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBÜRGH, Circuit Judge.
The Estherville Produce Company, a co-partnership composed of H. D. Hinseh and ■Frank Koch, and suing as a firm under local practice, was engaged in the poultry and egg-business at Estherville, Iowa. One of its regular customers, the commission firm of Levit & Woorman, had a place of business-at 345 South Front street in Philadelphia, Pa., but usually received 'shipments on track 7-A, Pier 62 South, in said city. The produce company had had dealings with this Philadelphia firm for a period of about six months prior to November, 1928, during which time goods had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. J. F. French & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Southern Express Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Ryan v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Intech, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934
- Greyvan Lines, Inc. v. NesmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Rountree v. Lydick-Barmann Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Satco, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.