Legal Opinion

State v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 6, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Wayne District Cowrt. — Hon. H. M. Townee, Judge. Defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of cheating by false pretenses, and from the judgment imposed appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Deemee, J. —

It is charged that by certain false, and fraudulent representations and pretenses defendant secured from one A. G. Widmer a certain check for’the sum of $5,000 -in -payment of fifty shares of stock in a corporation *394known as the Southwest Smelting & Refining Company, a corporation organized under the laws of New Mexico. The alleged representations were, in effect, as charged: (1) That the stock was of the par value of $100 per share. (2) That the indebtedness of the corporation did not exceed the sum of $10,000. (3) That the shares of stock were “treasury stock’” owned by the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Gere v. Council Bluffs Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Secor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FoxtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Erwin v. FillenwarthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. State v. McConnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. State v. KieferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. State v. BrundageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API