Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge
Plaintiff Capella Photonics filed suit against Cisco Systems, Fujitsu Network Communications (collectively “Defendants”), and two other parties alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. RE42,368 (the '368 patent) and RE 42,678 (the '678 patent). See, e.g., Docket No. 30 (First Amended Complaint Against Cisco). Both Cisco and Fujitsu answered Capella’s complaint, and both assert inequitable conduct as an affirmative defense. Docket No. 108 (Cisco’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Ocado Innovation Ltd., et al. v. AutoStore AS, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Tech., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Andritz Inc. v. Cortex North America CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Bliss v. AdewusiDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Bonner v. American Golf Corporation of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.