Legal Opinion
Ocado Innovation Ltd., et al. v. AutoStore AS, et al.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 30, 2021No. 21-cv-00041-JLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ocado Innovation Ltd., et al. v. Civil No. 1:21-cv-00041-JL Opinion No.
2021 DNH 190
AutoStore AS, et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER Known as the “atomic bomb of patent law” because, if proven, it renders entire patents unenforceable, the inequitable conduct defense has become a potent tool in a patent litigator’s toolbox. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.,
649 F.3d 1276, 1285
(Fed. Cir. 2011). As such, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals “tightened the inequitable conduct standard to ensure that the defense is sustained only in egregious…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Larson Manufacturing Co. of South Dakota, Inc. v. Aluminart Products Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ocado Innovation Ltd. v. AutoStore ASDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021