Legal Opinion
Boitnott v. Corning Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2012No. 19-1327PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GERGEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge SHEDD joined.
OPINION
GERGEL, District Judge:
This case involves a claim brought by Michael R. Boitnott (“Boitnott”) against his employer, Corning Incorporated (“Corning”), under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., in which Boitnott asserted that his inability to work more than eight hours per day and rotate day/night shifts as a result of physical impairments rendered him disabled under the ADA. Boitnott further asserted that Corning had violated the ADA by failing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tardie v. Rehabilitation HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PBM Graphics Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Bennett v. PermanenteDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Rogers v. DeaneDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.